Fishers, IN vs Hammond, IN
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Summary
Hammond spends 73.2% more per capita than Fishers ($18,879/person difference). Fishers, IN has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 84/100).
Fiscal Health Score
A
84/100
Budget Balance100
Debt Burden100
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency100
Revenue Diversity35
Trend Direction50
B
67/100
Budget Balance100
Debt Burden100
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency13
Revenue Diversity0
Trend Direction50
Key Metrics
Metric
Fishers
Hammond
Total Spending
$683.4M
$2.0B
Spending / Capita
$6,900
$25,779
Total Revenue
$3.8B
$2.7B
Revenue / Capita
$38,212
$34,733
Total Debt
$0
$10.0M
Debt / Capita
$0
$129
Population
99,041
77,390
Gov Employees / 10K
0.0
0.0
Avg Gov Salary
$0
$0
Per Capita Spending by Department
Fire Protection
Fishers$330
Hammond$789
Parks & Recreation
Fishers$655
Hammond$823
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
FishersHammond
| Sales Tax | $101 | $5 |
| Intergovernmental | $23,257 | $34,733 |
| Charges & Fees | $0 | $3,504 |
| Other | $2,313 | $8,679 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
FishersHammond
| Fire Protection | $330 | $789 |
| Public Welfare | $534 | $1,360 |
| Hospitals | $0 | $159 |
| Parks & Recreation | $655 | $823 |
| Housing | $1,613 | $3,937 |
| Sewerage | $169 | $0 |
| Utilities | $0 | $2,592 |
| Other | $3,599 | $16,119 |
A
Fishers, IN
Fiscal Health Score: 84/100
Excellent fiscal health
B
Hammond, IN
Fiscal Health Score: 67/100
Good fiscal health