Fishers, IN vs Hammond, IN
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Hammond, IN outspends Fishers, IN by a wide margin per resident — $25,779 versus $6,900, a 274% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Fishers, IN holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 84/100 (grade A) against 67/100 (grade B) for Hammond, IN — a 17-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
Fishers, IN reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Hammond, IN carries $129 per resident. Both cities pour the most per-resident dollars into the same function: parks and recreation leads in Fishers, IN at $655 per resident and in Hammond, IN at $823.
On the revenue side both lean hardest on intergovernmental transfers — 61% of total revenue in Fishers, IN and 100% in Hammond, IN.
Summary
Hammond spends 73.2% more per capita than Fishers ($18,879/person difference). Fishers, IN has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 84/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Sales Tax | $101 | $5 |
| Intergovernmental | $23,257 | $34,733 |
| Charges & Fees | $0 | $3,504 |
| Other | $2,313 | $8,679 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $330 | $789 |
| Public Welfare | $534 | $1,360 |
| Hospitals | $0 | $159 |
| Parks & Recreation | $655 | $823 |
| Housing | $1,613 | $3,937 |
| Sewerage | $169 | $0 |
| Utilities | $0 | $2,592 |
| Other | $3,599 | $16,119 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.