Gresham, OR vs Beaverton, OR
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Beaverton, OR and Gresham, OR spend within 10.1% of each other per resident — $11,934 versus $10,840 — so on the headline spending-per-capita measure the two cities are effectively neck and neck.
Beaverton, OR edges Gresham, OR on the Fiscal Health Score by 4 points — 50/100 (grade C) to 46/100 (grade D). At a margin this narrow the grade is close enough that the factor-level detail matters more than the composite.
On debt, Gresham, OR carries the lighter load at $978 per resident versus $2,344 for Beaverton, OR. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Gresham, OR leads with fire protection at $459 per resident, while Beaverton, OR leads with health at $994.
On the revenue side both lean hardest on intergovernmental transfers — 100% of total revenue in Gresham, OR and 100% in Beaverton, OR.
Summary
Beaverton spends 9.2% more per capita than Gresham ($1,095/person difference). Beaverton, OR has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (C, 50/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $28 | $25 |
| Sales Tax | $5 | $0 |
| Income Tax | $69 | $0 |
| Intergovernmental | $4,893 | $14,094 |
| Charges & Fees | $1,652 | $2,390 |
| Other | $3,781 | $1,691 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $459 | $268 |
| Highways & Roads | $184 | $0 |
| Public Welfare | $944 | $967 |
| Health | $0 | $994 |
| Hospitals | $662 | $455 |
| Parks & Recreation | $285 | $0 |
| Housing | $2,587 | $3,728 |
| Sewerage | $57 | $406 |
| Utilities | $1,126 | $1,470 |
| Other | $4,537 | $3,645 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.