Beaverton, OR vs Gresham, OR
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Beaverton, OR and Gresham, OR spend within 10.1% of each other per resident — $11,934 versus $10,840 — so on the headline spending-per-capita measure the two cities are effectively neck and neck.
Beaverton, OR edges Gresham, OR on the Fiscal Health Score by 4 points — 50/100 (grade C) to 46/100 (grade D). At a margin this narrow the grade is close enough that the factor-level detail matters more than the composite.
On debt, Gresham, OR carries the lighter load at $978 per resident versus $2,344 for Beaverton, OR. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Beaverton, OR leads with health at $994 per resident, while Gresham, OR leads with fire protection at $459.
On the revenue side both lean hardest on intergovernmental transfers — 100% of total revenue in Beaverton, OR and 100% in Gresham, OR.
Summary
Beaverton spends 10.1% more per capita than Gresham ($1,095/person difference). Beaverton, OR has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (C, 50/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $25 | $28 |
| Sales Tax | $0 | $5 |
| Income Tax | $0 | $69 |
| Intergovernmental | $14,094 | $4,893 |
| Charges & Fees | $2,390 | $1,652 |
| Other | $1,691 | $3,781 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $268 | $459 |
| Highways & Roads | $0 | $184 |
| Public Welfare | $967 | $944 |
| Health | $994 | $0 |
| Hospitals | $455 | $662 |
| Parks & Recreation | $0 | $285 |
| Housing | $3,728 | $2,587 |
| Sewerage | $406 | $57 |
| Utilities | $1,470 | $1,126 |
| Other | $3,645 | $4,537 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.