Greensboro, NC vs Concord, NC
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Greensboro, NC spends 19% more per resident than Concord, NC: $19,352 against $16,213. That gap is large enough to show up across most functional budget categories below.
Greensboro, NC edges Concord, NC on the Fiscal Health Score by 4 points — 58/100 (grade C) to 54/100 (grade C). At a margin this narrow the grade is close enough that the factor-level detail matters more than the composite.
On debt, Concord, NC carries the lighter load at $222 per resident versus $1,773 for Greensboro, NC. Both cities pour the most per-resident dollars into the same function: parks and recreation leads in Greensboro, NC at $3,225 per resident and in Concord, NC at $981.
They also fund themselves differently: other revenue is the largest single revenue source in Greensboro, NC at 12% of total revenue, whereas Concord, NC relies most on intergovernmental transfers at 100%.
Summary
Greensboro spends 19.4% more per capita than Concord ($3,139/person difference). Greensboro, NC has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (C, 58/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $0 | $15 |
| Sales Tax | $2,502 | $348 |
| Income Tax | $801 | $149 |
| Intergovernmental | $2,640 | $5,704 |
| Charges & Fees | $2,498 | $2,794 |
| Other | $2,691 | $2,455 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $340 | $242 |
| Highways & Roads | $570 | $8 |
| Education | $33 | $0 |
| Public Welfare | $1,134 | $1,019 |
| Health | $329 | $0 |
| Hospitals | $911 | $2,283 |
| Parks & Recreation | $3,225 | $981 |
| Housing | $3,186 | $2,735 |
| Sewerage | $207 | $0 |
| Utilities | $2,932 | $3,088 |
| Interest on Debt | $1,328 | $46 |
| Other | $5,155 | $5,812 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.