Concord, NC vs Greensboro, NC
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Greensboro, NC spends 19% more per resident than Concord, NC: $19,352 against $16,213. That gap is large enough to show up across most functional budget categories below.
Greensboro, NC edges Concord, NC on the Fiscal Health Score by 4 points — 58/100 (grade C) to 54/100 (grade C). At a margin this narrow the grade is close enough that the factor-level detail matters more than the composite.
On debt, Concord, NC carries the lighter load at $222 per resident versus $1,773 for Greensboro, NC. Both cities pour the most per-resident dollars into the same function: parks and recreation leads in Concord, NC at $981 per resident and in Greensboro, NC at $3,225.
They also fund themselves differently: intergovernmental transfers is the largest single revenue source in Concord, NC at 100% of total revenue, whereas Greensboro, NC relies most on other revenue at 12%.
Summary
Greensboro spends 16.2% more per capita than Concord ($3,139/person difference). Greensboro, NC has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (C, 58/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $15 | $0 |
| Sales Tax | $348 | $2,502 |
| Income Tax | $149 | $801 |
| Intergovernmental | $5,704 | $2,640 |
| Charges & Fees | $2,794 | $2,498 |
| Other | $2,455 | $2,691 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $242 | $340 |
| Highways & Roads | $8 | $570 |
| Education | $0 | $33 |
| Public Welfare | $1,019 | $1,134 |
| Health | $0 | $329 |
| Hospitals | $2,283 | $911 |
| Parks & Recreation | $981 | $3,225 |
| Housing | $2,735 | $3,186 |
| Sewerage | $0 | $207 |
| Utilities | $3,088 | $2,932 |
| Interest on Debt | $46 | $1,328 |
| Other | $5,812 | $5,155 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.