Greeley, CO vs Aurora, CO
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Aurora, CO and Greeley, CO spend within 0.2% of each other per resident — $17,400 versus $17,366 — so on the headline spending-per-capita measure the two cities are effectively neck and neck.
Aurora, CO holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 66/100 (grade B) against 42/100 (grade D) for Greeley, CO — a 24-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
On debt, Greeley, CO carries the lighter load at $1,247 per resident versus $4,017 for Aurora, CO. Both cities pour the most per-resident dollars into the same function: parks and recreation leads in Greeley, CO at $1,832 per resident and in Aurora, CO at $1,299.
They also fund themselves differently: intergovernmental transfers is the largest single revenue source in Greeley, CO at 76% of total revenue, whereas Aurora, CO relies most on charges and fees at 17%.
Summary
Aurora spends 0.2% more per capita than Greeley ($34/person difference). Aurora, CO has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 66/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $79 | $0 |
| Sales Tax | $982 | $303 |
| Intergovernmental | $10,897 | $825 |
| Charges & Fees | $5,308 | $3,728 |
| Other | $2,069 | $2,042 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $0 | $785 |
| Highways & Roads | $291 | $0 |
| Education | $1 | $0 |
| Public Welfare | $712 | $1,001 |
| Health | $0 | $185 |
| Hospitals | $733 | $678 |
| Parks & Recreation | $1,832 | $1,299 |
| Housing | $3,047 | $3,493 |
| Sewerage | $97 | $0 |
| Utilities | $4,341 | $1,978 |
| Interest on Debt | $893 | $0 |
| Other | $5,418 | $7,981 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.