Aurora, CO vs Greeley, CO
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Aurora, CO and Greeley, CO spend within 0.2% of each other per resident — $17,400 versus $17,366 — so on the headline spending-per-capita measure the two cities are effectively neck and neck.
Aurora, CO holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 66/100 (grade B) against 42/100 (grade D) for Greeley, CO — a 24-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
On debt, Greeley, CO carries the lighter load at $1,247 per resident versus $4,017 for Aurora, CO. Both cities pour the most per-resident dollars into the same function: parks and recreation leads in Aurora, CO at $1,299 per resident and in Greeley, CO at $1,832.
They also fund themselves differently: charges and fees is the largest single revenue source in Aurora, CO at 17% of total revenue, whereas Greeley, CO relies most on intergovernmental transfers at 76%.
Summary
Aurora spends 0.2% more per capita than Greeley ($34/person difference). Aurora, CO has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 66/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $0 | $79 |
| Sales Tax | $303 | $982 |
| Intergovernmental | $825 | $10,897 |
| Charges & Fees | $3,728 | $5,308 |
| Other | $2,042 | $2,069 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $785 | $0 |
| Highways & Roads | $0 | $291 |
| Education | $0 | $1 |
| Public Welfare | $1,001 | $712 |
| Health | $185 | $0 |
| Hospitals | $678 | $733 |
| Parks & Recreation | $1,299 | $1,832 |
| Housing | $3,493 | $3,047 |
| Sewerage | $0 | $97 |
| Utilities | $1,978 | $4,341 |
| Interest on Debt | $0 | $893 |
| Other | $7,981 | $5,418 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.