Skip to main content
Data from U.S. Census Bureau · 2026 · Methodology
CitySpend

Great Falls, MT vs Bozeman, MT

Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)

Summary

Bozeman spends 42.9% more per capita than Great Falls ($6,511/person difference). Great Falls, MT has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (C, 54/100).

Fiscal Health Score

City A
Great Falls, MT
Pop. 60,373
C
54/100
Budget Balance74
Debt Burden0
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency100
Revenue Diversity0
Trend Direction50
City B
Bozeman, MT
Pop. 53,500
C
52/100
Budget Balance62
Debt Burden19
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency82
Revenue Diversity0
Trend Direction50

Key Metrics

Metric
Great Falls
Bozeman
Total Spending
$522.6M
$811.5M
Spending / Capita
$8,656
$15,168
Total Revenue
$652.9M
$1.1B
Revenue / Capita
$10,814
$20,285
Total Debt
$90.0M
$34.7M
Debt / Capita
$1,490
$649
Population
60,373
53,500
Gov Employees / 10K
0.0
0.0
Avg Gov Salary
$0
$0

Per Capita Spending by Department

Fire Protection
Great Falls$251
Bozeman$225
Highways & Roads
Great Falls$0
Bozeman$342
Parks & Recreation
Great Falls$1,064
Bozeman$1,158
Health
Great Falls$229
Bozeman$652

Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)

Great FallsBozeman
Property Tax
$48
$1,537
Sales Tax
$595
$257
Income Tax
$882
$1,098
Intergovernmental
$10,814
$20,285
Charges & Fees
$2,342
$2,302
Other
$2,571
$3,290

Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)

Great FallsBozeman
Fire Protection
$251
$225
Highways & Roads
$0
$342
Public Welfare
$755
$1,379
Health
$229
$652
Hospitals
$525
$52
Parks & Recreation
$1,064
$1,158
Housing
$1,988
$2,467
Sewerage
$0
$588
Utilities
$1,755
$3,995
Other
$2,089
$4,311
C
Great Falls, MT
Fiscal Health Score: 54/100
Average fiscal health
C
Bozeman, MT
Fiscal Health Score: 52/100
Average fiscal health

Compare More Cities