Skip to main content
Data from U.S. Census Bureau · 2026 · Methodology
CitySpend

Bozeman, MT vs Great Falls, MT

Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)

Summary

Bozeman spends 75.2% more per capita than Great Falls ($6,511/person difference). Great Falls, MT has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (C, 54/100).

Fiscal Health Score

City A
Bozeman, MT
Pop. 53,500
C
52/100
Budget Balance62
Debt Burden19
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency82
Revenue Diversity0
Trend Direction50
City B
Great Falls, MT
Pop. 60,373
C
54/100
Budget Balance74
Debt Burden0
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency100
Revenue Diversity0
Trend Direction50

Key Metrics

Metric
Bozeman
Great Falls
Total Spending
$811.5M
$522.6M
Spending / Capita
$15,168
$8,656
Total Revenue
$1.1B
$652.9M
Revenue / Capita
$20,285
$10,814
Total Debt
$34.7M
$90.0M
Debt / Capita
$649
$1,490
Population
53,500
60,373
Gov Employees / 10K
0.0
0.0
Avg Gov Salary
$0
$0

Per Capita Spending by Department

Fire Protection
Bozeman$225
Great Falls$251
Highways & Roads
Bozeman$342
Great Falls$0
Parks & Recreation
Bozeman$1,158
Great Falls$1,064
Health
Bozeman$652
Great Falls$229

Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)

BozemanGreat Falls
Property Tax
$1,537
$48
Sales Tax
$257
$595
Income Tax
$1,098
$882
Intergovernmental
$20,285
$10,814
Charges & Fees
$2,302
$2,342
Other
$3,290
$2,571

Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)

BozemanGreat Falls
Fire Protection
$225
$251
Highways & Roads
$342
$0
Public Welfare
$1,379
$755
Health
$652
$229
Hospitals
$52
$525
Parks & Recreation
$1,158
$1,064
Housing
$2,467
$1,988
Sewerage
$588
$0
Utilities
$3,995
$1,755
Other
$4,311
$2,089
C
Bozeman, MT
Fiscal Health Score: 52/100
Average fiscal health
C
Great Falls, MT
Fiscal Health Score: 54/100
Average fiscal health

Compare More Cities