Bozeman, MT vs Great Falls, MT
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Summary
Bozeman spends 75.2% more per capita than Great Falls ($6,511/person difference). Great Falls, MT has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (C, 54/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $1,537 | $48 |
| Sales Tax | $257 | $595 |
| Income Tax | $1,098 | $882 |
| Intergovernmental | $20,285 | $10,814 |
| Charges & Fees | $2,302 | $2,342 |
| Other | $3,290 | $2,571 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $225 | $251 |
| Highways & Roads | $342 | $0 |
| Public Welfare | $1,379 | $755 |
| Health | $652 | $229 |
| Hospitals | $52 | $525 |
| Parks & Recreation | $1,158 | $1,064 |
| Housing | $2,467 | $1,988 |
| Sewerage | $588 | $0 |
| Utilities | $3,995 | $1,755 |
| Other | $4,311 | $2,089 |
Compare More Cities
The side-by-side above pulls the the Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances data for both entity A and entity B. What follows is the interpretation — which specific axes carry the most weight for entity A versus entity B, and which differences are large enough to influence a real decision.
Practical use of the comparison: read the data above, then drill into the individual entity A and entity B detail pages for the underlying breakdown. A pairwise comparison answers the relative question; the per-entity pages answer the absolute question.
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.