Fort Collins, CO vs Centennial, CO
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Fort Collins, CO outspends Centennial, CO by a wide margin per resident — $26,163 versus $54, a 48466% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Centennial, CO holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 80/100 (grade A) against 44/100 (grade D) for Fort Collins, CO — a 36-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
Centennial, CO reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Fort Collins, CO carries $318 per resident. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Fort Collins, CO leads with highways and roads at $2,411 per resident, while Centennial, CO leads with parks and recreation at $54.
On the revenue side both lean hardest on intergovernmental transfers — 100% of total revenue in Fort Collins, CO and 100% in Centennial, CO.
Summary
Fort Collins spends 48466.5% more per capita than Centennial ($26,109/person difference). Centennial, CO has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 80/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $620 | $0 |
| Sales Tax | $618 | $0 |
| Intergovernmental | $13,229 | $243 |
| Charges & Fees | $2,187 | $0 |
| Other | $3,358 | $0 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $323 | $0 |
| Highways & Roads | $2,411 | $0 |
| Education | $49 | $0 |
| Public Welfare | $2,292 | $0 |
| Hospitals | $1,022 | $0 |
| Parks & Recreation | $2,355 | $54 |
| Housing | $3,104 | $0 |
| Utilities | $5,637 | $0 |
| Interest on Debt | $3,129 | $0 |
| Other | $5,843 | $0 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.