Centennial, CO vs Fort Collins, CO
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Fort Collins, CO outspends Centennial, CO by a wide margin per resident — $26,163 versus $54, a 48466% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Centennial, CO holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 80/100 (grade A) against 44/100 (grade D) for Fort Collins, CO — a 36-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
Centennial, CO reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Fort Collins, CO carries $318 per resident. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Centennial, CO leads with parks and recreation at $54 per resident, while Fort Collins, CO leads with highways and roads at $2,411.
On the revenue side both lean hardest on intergovernmental transfers — 100% of total revenue in Centennial, CO and 100% in Fort Collins, CO.
Summary
Fort Collins spends 99.8% more per capita than Centennial ($26,109/person difference). Centennial, CO has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 80/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $0 | $620 |
| Sales Tax | $0 | $618 |
| Intergovernmental | $243 | $13,229 |
| Charges & Fees | $0 | $2,187 |
| Other | $0 | $3,358 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $0 | $323 |
| Highways & Roads | $0 | $2,411 |
| Education | $0 | $49 |
| Public Welfare | $0 | $2,292 |
| Hospitals | $0 | $1,022 |
| Parks & Recreation | $54 | $2,355 |
| Housing | $0 | $3,104 |
| Utilities | $0 | $5,637 |
| Interest on Debt | $0 | $3,129 |
| Other | $0 | $5,843 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.