Skip to main content
Data from U.S. Census Bureau · 2026 · Methodology
CitySpend

Fishers, IN vs Carmel, IN

Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)

Summary

Carmel spends 57.9% more per capita than Fishers ($9,489/person difference). Fishers, IN has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 84/100).

Fiscal Health Score

City A
Fishers, IN
Pop. 99,041
A
84/100
Budget Balance100
Debt Burden100
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency100
Revenue Diversity35
Trend Direction50
City B
Carmel, IN
Pop. 99,453
C
56/100
Budget Balance100
Debt Burden0
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency74
Revenue Diversity0
Trend Direction50

Key Metrics

Metric
Fishers
Carmel
Total Spending
$683.4M
$1.6B
Spending / Capita
$6,900
$16,389
Total Revenue
$3.8B
$9.0B
Revenue / Capita
$38,212
$90,764
Total Debt
$0
$84.1M
Debt / Capita
$0
$846
Population
99,041
99,453
Gov Employees / 10K
0.0
0.0
Avg Gov Salary
$0
$0

Per Capita Spending by Department

Fire Protection
Fishers$330
Carmel$166
Highways & Roads
Fishers$0
Carmel$354
Parks & Recreation
Fishers$655
Carmel$1,484

Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)

FishersCarmel
Sales Tax
$101
$1,264
Intergovernmental
$23,257
$90,764
Charges & Fees
$0
$5,500
Other
$2,313
$2,404

Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)

FishersCarmel
Fire Protection
$330
$166
Highways & Roads
$0
$354
Public Welfare
$534
$1,885
Hospitals
$0
$1,121
Parks & Recreation
$655
$1,484
Housing
$1,613
$2,696
Sewerage
$169
$0
Utilities
$0
$1,251
Other
$3,599
$7,432
A
Fishers, IN
Fiscal Health Score: 84/100
Excellent fiscal health
C
Carmel, IN
Fiscal Health Score: 56/100
Average fiscal health

Compare More Cities