Fishers, IN vs Carmel, IN
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Summary
Carmel spends 57.9% more per capita than Fishers ($9,489/person difference). Fishers, IN has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 84/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Sales Tax | $101 | $1,264 |
| Intergovernmental | $23,257 | $90,764 |
| Charges & Fees | $0 | $5,500 |
| Other | $2,313 | $2,404 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $330 | $166 |
| Highways & Roads | $0 | $354 |
| Public Welfare | $534 | $1,885 |
| Hospitals | $0 | $1,121 |
| Parks & Recreation | $655 | $1,484 |
| Housing | $1,613 | $2,696 |
| Sewerage | $169 | $0 |
| Utilities | $0 | $1,251 |
| Other | $3,599 | $7,432 |
Compare More Cities
The side-by-side above pulls the the Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances data for both entity A and entity B. What follows is the interpretation — which specific axes carry the most weight for entity A versus entity B, and which differences are large enough to influence a real decision.
Practical use of the comparison: read the data above, then drill into the individual entity A and entity B detail pages for the underlying breakdown. A pairwise comparison answers the relative question; the per-entity pages answer the absolute question.
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.