Carmel, IN vs Fishers, IN
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Summary
Carmel spends 137.5% more per capita than Fishers ($9,489/person difference). Fishers, IN has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 84/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Sales Tax | $1,264 | $101 |
| Intergovernmental | $90,764 | $23,257 |
| Charges & Fees | $5,500 | $0 |
| Other | $2,404 | $2,313 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $166 | $330 |
| Highways & Roads | $354 | $0 |
| Public Welfare | $1,885 | $534 |
| Hospitals | $1,121 | $0 |
| Parks & Recreation | $1,484 | $655 |
| Housing | $2,696 | $1,613 |
| Sewerage | $0 | $169 |
| Utilities | $1,251 | $0 |
| Other | $7,432 | $3,599 |
Compare More Cities
The side-by-side above pulls the the Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances data for both entity A and entity B. What follows is the interpretation — which specific axes carry the most weight for entity A versus entity B, and which differences are large enough to influence a real decision.
Practical use of the comparison: read the data above, then drill into the individual entity A and entity B detail pages for the underlying breakdown. A pairwise comparison answers the relative question; the per-entity pages answer the absolute question.
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.