Colorado Springs, CO vs Centennial, CO
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Colorado Springs, CO outspends Centennial, CO by a wide margin per resident — $13,222 versus $54, a 24445% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Centennial, CO holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 80/100 (grade A) against 59/100 (grade C) for Colorado Springs, CO — a 21-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
Centennial, CO reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Colorado Springs, CO carries $3,063 per resident. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Colorado Springs, CO leads with fire protection at $1,266 per resident, while Centennial, CO leads with parks and recreation at $54.
On the revenue side both lean hardest on intergovernmental transfers — 13% of total revenue in Colorado Springs, CO and 100% in Centennial, CO.
Summary
Colorado Springs spends 24444.7% more per capita than Centennial ($13,169/person difference). Centennial, CO has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 80/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Sales Tax | $257 | $0 |
| Intergovernmental | $6,902 | $243 |
| Charges & Fees | $5,676 | $0 |
| Other | $2,678 | $0 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $1,266 | $0 |
| Public Welfare | $575 | $0 |
| Hospitals | $416 | $0 |
| Parks & Recreation | $376 | $54 |
| Housing | $2,713 | $0 |
| Utilities | $2,566 | $0 |
| Interest on Debt | $190 | $0 |
| Other | $5,120 | $0 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.