Centennial, CO vs Colorado Springs, CO
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Colorado Springs, CO outspends Centennial, CO by a wide margin per resident — $13,222 versus $54, a 24445% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Centennial, CO holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 80/100 (grade A) against 59/100 (grade C) for Colorado Springs, CO — a 21-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
Centennial, CO reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Colorado Springs, CO carries $3,063 per resident. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Centennial, CO leads with parks and recreation at $54 per resident, while Colorado Springs, CO leads with fire protection at $1,266.
On the revenue side both lean hardest on intergovernmental transfers — 100% of total revenue in Centennial, CO and 13% in Colorado Springs, CO.
Summary
Colorado Springs spends 99.6% more per capita than Centennial ($13,169/person difference). Centennial, CO has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 80/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Sales Tax | $0 | $257 |
| Intergovernmental | $243 | $6,902 |
| Charges & Fees | $0 | $5,676 |
| Other | $0 | $2,678 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $0 | $1,266 |
| Public Welfare | $0 | $575 |
| Hospitals | $0 | $416 |
| Parks & Recreation | $54 | $376 |
| Housing | $0 | $2,713 |
| Utilities | $0 | $2,566 |
| Interest on Debt | $0 | $190 |
| Other | $0 | $5,120 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.