Skip to main content
Data from U.S. Census Bureau · 2026 · Methodology
CitySpend

Colorado Springs, CO vs Bakersfield, CA

Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)

Summary

Colorado Springs spends 14.2% more per capita than Bakersfield ($1,647/person difference). Colorado Springs, CO has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (C, 59/100).

Fiscal Health Score

City A
Colorado Springs, CO
Pop. 479,612
C
59/100
Budget Balance54
Debt Burden0
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency100
Revenue Diversity100
Trend Direction50
City B
Bakersfield, CA
Pop. 404,321
C
56/100
Budget Balance2
Debt Burden100
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency100
Revenue Diversity0
Trend Direction50

Key Metrics

Metric
Colorado Springs
Bakersfield
Total Spending
$6.3B
$4.7B
Spending / Capita
$13,222
$11,576
Total Revenue
$25.3B
$1.6B
Revenue / Capita
$52,777
$3,862
Total Debt
$1.5B
$0
Debt / Capita
$3,063
$0
Population
479,612
404,321
Gov Employees / 10K
0.0
0.0
Avg Gov Salary
$0
$0

Per Capita Spending by Department

Fire Protection
Colorado Springs$1,266
Bakersfield$0
Parks & Recreation
Colorado Springs$376
Bakersfield$741

Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)

Colorado SpringsBakersfield
Property Tax
$0
$1
Sales Tax
$257
$20
Income Tax
$0
$1,909
Intergovernmental
$6,902
$3,862
Charges & Fees
$5,676
$1,024
Other
$2,678
$1,915

Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)

Colorado SpringsBakersfield
Fire Protection
$1,266
$0
Public Welfare
$575
$840
Hospitals
$416
$425
Parks & Recreation
$376
$741
Housing
$2,713
$3,391
Sewerage
$0
$265
Utilities
$2,566
$2,679
Interest on Debt
$190
$0
Other
$5,120
$3,234
C
Colorado Springs, CO
Fiscal Health Score: 59/100
Average fiscal health
C
Bakersfield, CA
Fiscal Health Score: 56/100
Average fiscal health

Compare More Cities