Skip to main content
Data from U.S. Census Bureau · 2026 · Methodology
CitySpend

Bakersfield, CA vs Colorado Springs, CO

Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)

Summary

Colorado Springs spends 12.5% more per capita than Bakersfield ($1,647/person difference). Colorado Springs, CO has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (C, 59/100).

Fiscal Health Score

City A
Bakersfield, CA
Pop. 404,321
C
56/100
Budget Balance2
Debt Burden100
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency100
Revenue Diversity0
Trend Direction50
City B
Colorado Springs, CO
Pop. 479,612
C
59/100
Budget Balance54
Debt Burden0
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency100
Revenue Diversity100
Trend Direction50

Key Metrics

Metric
Bakersfield
Colorado Springs
Total Spending
$4.7B
$6.3B
Spending / Capita
$11,576
$13,222
Total Revenue
$1.6B
$25.3B
Revenue / Capita
$3,862
$52,777
Total Debt
$0
$1.5B
Debt / Capita
$0
$3,063
Population
404,321
479,612
Gov Employees / 10K
0.0
0.0
Avg Gov Salary
$0
$0

Per Capita Spending by Department

Fire Protection
Bakersfield$0
Colorado Springs$1,266
Parks & Recreation
Bakersfield$741
Colorado Springs$376

Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)

BakersfieldColorado Springs
Property Tax
$1
$0
Sales Tax
$20
$257
Income Tax
$1,909
$0
Intergovernmental
$3,862
$6,902
Charges & Fees
$1,024
$5,676
Other
$1,915
$2,678

Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)

BakersfieldColorado Springs
Fire Protection
$0
$1,266
Public Welfare
$840
$575
Hospitals
$425
$416
Parks & Recreation
$741
$376
Housing
$3,391
$2,713
Sewerage
$265
$0
Utilities
$2,679
$2,566
Interest on Debt
$0
$190
Other
$3,234
$5,120
C
Bakersfield, CA
Fiscal Health Score: 56/100
Average fiscal health
C
Colorado Springs, CO
Fiscal Health Score: 59/100
Average fiscal health

Compare More Cities