Colorado Springs, CO vs Atlanta, GA
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Atlanta, GA outspends Colorado Springs, CO by a wide margin per resident — $25,457 versus $13,222, a 93% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Atlanta, GA holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 85/100 (grade A) against 59/100 (grade C) for Colorado Springs, CO — a 26-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
Atlanta, GA reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Colorado Springs, CO carries $3,063 per resident. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Colorado Springs, CO leads with fire protection at $1,266 per resident, while Atlanta, GA leads with parks and recreation at $1,274.
On the revenue side both lean hardest on intergovernmental transfers — 13% of total revenue in Colorado Springs, CO and 6% in Atlanta, GA.
Summary
Atlanta spends 48.1% more per capita than Colorado Springs ($12,235/person difference). Atlanta, GA has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 85/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $0 | $419 |
| Sales Tax | $257 | $0 |
| Income Tax | $0 | $1,292 |
| Intergovernmental | $6,902 | $9,121 |
| Charges & Fees | $5,676 | $5,645 |
| Other | $2,678 | $5,461 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $0 | $315 |
| Fire Protection | $1,266 | $464 |
| Highways & Roads | $0 | $513 |
| Education | $0 | $25 |
| Public Welfare | $575 | $1,587 |
| Hospitals | $416 | $55 |
| Parks & Recreation | $376 | $1,274 |
| Housing | $2,713 | $4,594 |
| Sewerage | $0 | $343 |
| Utilities | $2,566 | $8,026 |
| Interest on Debt | $190 | $0 |
| Other | $5,120 | $8,262 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.