Atlanta, GA vs Colorado Springs, CO
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Atlanta, GA outspends Colorado Springs, CO by a wide margin per resident — $25,457 versus $13,222, a 93% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Atlanta, GA holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 85/100 (grade A) against 59/100 (grade C) for Colorado Springs, CO — a 26-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
Atlanta, GA reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Colorado Springs, CO carries $3,063 per resident. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Atlanta, GA leads with parks and recreation at $1,274 per resident, while Colorado Springs, CO leads with fire protection at $1,266.
On the revenue side both lean hardest on intergovernmental transfers — 6% of total revenue in Atlanta, GA and 13% in Colorado Springs, CO.
Summary
Atlanta spends 92.5% more per capita than Colorado Springs ($12,235/person difference). Atlanta, GA has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 85/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $419 | $0 |
| Sales Tax | $0 | $257 |
| Income Tax | $1,292 | $0 |
| Intergovernmental | $9,121 | $6,902 |
| Charges & Fees | $5,645 | $5,676 |
| Other | $5,461 | $2,678 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $315 | $0 |
| Fire Protection | $464 | $1,266 |
| Highways & Roads | $513 | $0 |
| Education | $25 | $0 |
| Public Welfare | $1,587 | $575 |
| Hospitals | $55 | $416 |
| Parks & Recreation | $1,274 | $376 |
| Housing | $4,594 | $2,713 |
| Sewerage | $343 | $0 |
| Utilities | $8,026 | $2,566 |
| Interest on Debt | $0 | $190 |
| Other | $8,262 | $5,120 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.