Skip to main content
Data from U.S. Census Bureau · 2026 · Methodology
CitySpend

Chicago, IL vs Houston, TX

Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)

Summary

Chicago spends 139.9% more per capita than Houston ($20,152/person difference). Houston, TX has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 83/100).

Fiscal Health Score

City A
Chicago, IL
Pop. 2,721,914
C
61/100
Budget Balance100
Debt Burden61
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency22
Revenue Diversity0
Trend Direction50
City B
Houston, TX
Pop. 2,296,253
A
83/100
Budget Balance94
Debt Burden72
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency100
Revenue Diversity100
Trend Direction50

Key Metrics

Metric
Chicago
Houston
Total Spending
$94.0B
$33.1B
Spending / Capita
$34,551
$14,400
Total Revenue
$231.6B
$127.7B
Revenue / Capita
$85,083
$55,600
Total Debt
$2.7B
$2.0B
Debt / Capita
$977
$863
Population
2,721,914
2,296,253
Gov Employees / 10K
0.0
0.0
Avg Gov Salary
$0
$0

Per Capita Spending by Department

Fire Protection
Chicago$10,754
Houston$295
Highways & Roads
Chicago$930
Houston$175
Parks & Recreation
Chicago$122
Houston$361
Health
Chicago$426
Houston$210

Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)

ChicagoHouston
Property Tax
$26
$0
Sales Tax
$74
$181
Income Tax
$229
$39
Intergovernmental
$85,083
$33
Charges & Fees
$2,847
$3,475
Other
$3,463
$3,960

Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)

ChicagoHouston
Fire Protection
$10,754
$295
Highways & Roads
$930
$175
Public Welfare
$1,858
$533
Health
$426
$210
Hospitals
$1,444
$511
Parks & Recreation
$122
$361
Housing
$6,520
$4,288
Sewerage
$129
$386
Utilities
$2,983
$1,339
Other
$9,385
$6,301
C
Chicago, IL
Fiscal Health Score: 61/100
Average fiscal health
A
Houston, TX
Fiscal Health Score: 83/100
Excellent fiscal health

Compare More Cities