Skip to main content
Data from U.S. Census Bureau · 2026 · Methodology
CitySpend

Bozeman, MT vs Billings, MT

Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)

Summary

Bozeman spends 21.3% more per capita than Billings ($2,667/person difference). Billings, MT has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 67/100).

Fiscal Health Score

City A
Bozeman, MT
Pop. 53,500
C
52/100
Budget Balance62
Debt Burden19
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency82
Revenue Diversity0
Trend Direction50
City B
Billings, MT
Pop. 117,093
B
67/100
Budget Balance78
Debt Burden11
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency100
Revenue Diversity100
Trend Direction50

Key Metrics

Metric
Bozeman
Billings
Total Spending
$811.5M
$1.5B
Spending / Capita
$15,168
$12,501
Total Revenue
$1.1B
$1.8B
Revenue / Capita
$20,285
$15,768
Total Debt
$34.7M
$135.6M
Debt / Capita
$649
$1,158
Population
53,500
117,093
Gov Employees / 10K
0.0
0.0
Avg Gov Salary
$0
$0

Per Capita Spending by Department

Fire Protection
Bozeman$225
Billings$145
Highways & Roads
Bozeman$342
Billings$0
Parks & Recreation
Bozeman$1,158
Billings$883
Health
Bozeman$652
Billings$330

Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)

BozemanBillings
Property Tax
$1,537
$787
Sales Tax
$257
$251
Income Tax
$1,098
$1,706
Intergovernmental
$20,285
$1,539
Charges & Fees
$2,302
$2,714
Other
$3,290
$2,720

Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)

BozemanBillings
Fire Protection
$225
$145
Highways & Roads
$342
$0
Public Welfare
$1,379
$1,929
Health
$652
$330
Hospitals
$52
$105
Parks & Recreation
$1,158
$883
Housing
$2,467
$2,463
Sewerage
$588
$195
Utilities
$3,995
$2,914
Interest on Debt
$0
$535
Other
$4,311
$3,002
C
Bozeman, MT
Fiscal Health Score: 52/100
Average fiscal health
B
Billings, MT
Fiscal Health Score: 67/100
Good fiscal health

Compare More Cities