Bozeman, MT vs Billings, MT
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Bozeman, MT spends 21% more per resident than Billings, MT: $15,168 against $12,501. That gap is large enough to show up across most functional budget categories below.
Billings, MT holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 67/100 (grade B) against 52/100 (grade C) for Bozeman, MT — a 15-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
On debt, Bozeman, MT carries the lighter load at $649 per resident versus $1,158 for Billings, MT. Both cities pour the most per-resident dollars into the same function: parks and recreation leads in Bozeman, MT at $1,158 per resident and in Billings, MT at $883.
They also fund themselves differently: intergovernmental transfers is the largest single revenue source in Bozeman, MT at 100% of total revenue, whereas Billings, MT relies most on other revenue at 17%.
Summary
Bozeman spends 21.3% more per capita than Billings ($2,667/person difference). Billings, MT has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 67/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $1,537 | $787 |
| Sales Tax | $257 | $251 |
| Income Tax | $1,098 | $1,706 |
| Intergovernmental | $20,285 | $1,539 |
| Charges & Fees | $2,302 | $2,714 |
| Other | $3,290 | $2,720 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $225 | $145 |
| Highways & Roads | $342 | $0 |
| Public Welfare | $1,379 | $1,929 |
| Health | $652 | $330 |
| Hospitals | $52 | $105 |
| Parks & Recreation | $1,158 | $883 |
| Housing | $2,467 | $2,463 |
| Sewerage | $588 | $195 |
| Utilities | $3,995 | $2,914 |
| Interest on Debt | $0 | $535 |
| Other | $4,311 | $3,002 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.