Skip to main content
Data from U.S. Census Bureau · 2026 · Methodology
CitySpend

Billings, MT vs Bozeman, MT

Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)

Summary

Bozeman spends 17.6% more per capita than Billings ($2,667/person difference). Billings, MT has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 67/100).

Fiscal Health Score

City A
Billings, MT
Pop. 117,093
B
67/100
Budget Balance78
Debt Burden11
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency100
Revenue Diversity100
Trend Direction50
City B
Bozeman, MT
Pop. 53,500
C
52/100
Budget Balance62
Debt Burden19
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency82
Revenue Diversity0
Trend Direction50

Key Metrics

Metric
Billings
Bozeman
Total Spending
$1.5B
$811.5M
Spending / Capita
$12,501
$15,168
Total Revenue
$1.8B
$1.1B
Revenue / Capita
$15,768
$20,285
Total Debt
$135.6M
$34.7M
Debt / Capita
$1,158
$649
Population
117,093
53,500
Gov Employees / 10K
0.0
0.0
Avg Gov Salary
$0
$0

Per Capita Spending by Department

Fire Protection
Billings$145
Bozeman$225
Highways & Roads
Billings$0
Bozeman$342
Parks & Recreation
Billings$883
Bozeman$1,158
Health
Billings$330
Bozeman$652

Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)

BillingsBozeman
Property Tax
$787
$1,537
Sales Tax
$251
$257
Income Tax
$1,706
$1,098
Intergovernmental
$1,539
$20,285
Charges & Fees
$2,714
$2,302
Other
$2,720
$3,290

Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)

BillingsBozeman
Fire Protection
$145
$225
Highways & Roads
$0
$342
Public Welfare
$1,929
$1,379
Health
$330
$652
Hospitals
$105
$52
Parks & Recreation
$883
$1,158
Housing
$2,463
$2,467
Sewerage
$195
$588
Utilities
$2,914
$3,995
Interest on Debt
$535
$0
Other
$3,002
$4,311
B
Billings, MT
Fiscal Health Score: 67/100
Good fiscal health
C
Bozeman, MT
Fiscal Health Score: 52/100
Average fiscal health

Compare More Cities