Skip to main content
Data from U.S. Census Bureau · 2026 · Methodology
CitySpend

Birmingham, AL vs Auburn, AL

Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)

Summary

Birmingham spends 159.7% more per capita than Auburn ($18,935/person difference). Auburn, AL has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 80/100).

Fiscal Health Score

City A
Birmingham, AL
Pop. 200,431
C
55/100
Budget Balance100
Debt Burden0
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency0
Revenue Diversity100
Trend Direction50
City B
Auburn, AL
Pop. 76,660
A
80/100
Budget Balance100
Debt Burden100
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency100
Revenue Diversity0
Trend Direction50

Key Metrics

Metric
Birmingham
Auburn
Total Spending
$6.2B
$908.9M
Spending / Capita
$30,790
$11,856
Total Revenue
$16.0B
$1.2B
Revenue / Capita
$79,635
$15,016
Total Debt
$565.8M
$0
Debt / Capita
$2,823
$0
Population
200,431
76,660
Gov Employees / 10K
0.0
0.0
Avg Gov Salary
$0
$0

Per Capita Spending by Department

Police
Birmingham$22
Auburn$0
Fire Protection
Birmingham$1,152
Auburn$551
Highways & Roads
Birmingham$848
Auburn$0
Parks & Recreation
Birmingham$1,823
Auburn$934
Health
Birmingham$683
Auburn$328

Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)

BirminghamAuburn
Property Tax
$44
$0
Sales Tax
$281
$22
Income Tax
$0
$713
Intergovernmental
$468
$15,016
Charges & Fees
$10,460
$1,773
Other
$734
$3,814

Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)

BirminghamAuburn
Police
$22
$0
Fire Protection
$1,152
$551
Highways & Roads
$848
$0
Public Welfare
$2,110
$1,001
Health
$683
$328
Hospitals
$1,505
$1,012
Parks & Recreation
$1,823
$934
Housing
$5,487
$2,229
Sewerage
$594
$182
Utilities
$5,451
$1,765
Other
$11,115
$3,853
C
Birmingham, AL
Fiscal Health Score: 55/100
Average fiscal health
A
Auburn, AL
Fiscal Health Score: 80/100
Excellent fiscal health

Compare More Cities