Skip to main content
Data from U.S. Census Bureau · 2026 · Methodology
CitySpend

Auburn, AL vs Birmingham, AL

Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)

Summary

Birmingham spends 61.5% more per capita than Auburn ($18,935/person difference). Auburn, AL has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 80/100).

Fiscal Health Score

City A
Auburn, AL
Pop. 76,660
A
80/100
Budget Balance100
Debt Burden100
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency100
Revenue Diversity0
Trend Direction50
City B
Birmingham, AL
Pop. 200,431
C
55/100
Budget Balance100
Debt Burden0
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency0
Revenue Diversity100
Trend Direction50

Key Metrics

Metric
Auburn
Birmingham
Total Spending
$908.9M
$6.2B
Spending / Capita
$11,856
$30,790
Total Revenue
$1.2B
$16.0B
Revenue / Capita
$15,016
$79,635
Total Debt
$0
$565.8M
Debt / Capita
$0
$2,823
Population
76,660
200,431
Gov Employees / 10K
0.0
0.0
Avg Gov Salary
$0
$0

Per Capita Spending by Department

Police
Auburn$0
Birmingham$22
Fire Protection
Auburn$551
Birmingham$1,152
Highways & Roads
Auburn$0
Birmingham$848
Parks & Recreation
Auburn$934
Birmingham$1,823
Health
Auburn$328
Birmingham$683

Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)

AuburnBirmingham
Property Tax
$0
$44
Sales Tax
$22
$281
Income Tax
$713
$0
Intergovernmental
$15,016
$468
Charges & Fees
$1,773
$10,460
Other
$3,814
$734

Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)

AuburnBirmingham
Police
$0
$22
Fire Protection
$551
$1,152
Highways & Roads
$0
$848
Public Welfare
$1,001
$2,110
Health
$328
$683
Hospitals
$1,012
$1,505
Parks & Recreation
$934
$1,823
Housing
$2,229
$5,487
Sewerage
$182
$594
Utilities
$1,765
$5,451
Other
$3,853
$11,115
A
Auburn, AL
Fiscal Health Score: 80/100
Excellent fiscal health
C
Birmingham, AL
Fiscal Health Score: 55/100
Average fiscal health

Compare More Cities