Bethlehem, PA vs Philadelphia, PA
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Philadelphia, PA outspends Bethlehem, PA by a wide margin per resident — $56,272 versus $14,468, a 289% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Bethlehem, PA holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 88/100 (grade A) against 45/100 (grade D) for Philadelphia, PA — a 43-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
Bethlehem, PA reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Philadelphia, PA carries $1,069 per resident. Both cities pour the most per-resident dollars into the same function: fire protection leads in Bethlehem, PA at $1,642 per resident and in Philadelphia, PA at $7,082.
They also fund themselves differently: other revenue is the largest single revenue source in Bethlehem, PA at 16% of total revenue, whereas Philadelphia, PA relies most on intergovernmental transfers at 16%.
Summary
Philadelphia spends 74.3% more per capita than Bethlehem ($41,804/person difference). Bethlehem, PA has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 88/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $1 | $0 |
| Sales Tax | $405 | $107 |
| Income Tax | $308 | $8 |
| Intergovernmental | $3,237 | $6,288 |
| Charges & Fees | $3,296 | $2,790 |
| Other | $3,969 | $4,029 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $0 | $1,505 |
| Fire Protection | $1,642 | $7,082 |
| Highways & Roads | $668 | $1,215 |
| Public Welfare | $1,218 | $1,456 |
| Health | $187 | $229 |
| Hospitals | $526 | $4,048 |
| Parks & Recreation | $634 | $593 |
| Housing | $2,229 | $4,902 |
| Sewerage | $68 | $325 |
| Utilities | $2,000 | $4,222 |
| Interest on Debt | $0 | $3 |
| Other | $5,296 | $30,692 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.