Aurora, IL vs Naperville, IL
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Summary
Naperville spends 2.9% more per capita than Aurora ($450/person difference). Aurora, IL has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 87/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Sales Tax | $114 | $0 |
| Income Tax | $144 | $0 |
| Intergovernmental | $2,481 | $458 |
| Charges & Fees | $2,224 | $4,765 |
| Other | $1,114 | $2,388 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $216 | $0 |
| Public Welfare | $922 | $0 |
| Health | $0 | $1,028 |
| Hospitals | $257 | $0 |
| Parks & Recreation | $494 | $544 |
| Housing | $4,836 | $0 |
| Utilities | $2,366 | $4,527 |
| Other | $6,210 | $9,652 |
Compare More Cities
The side-by-side above pulls the the Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances data for both entity A and entity B. What follows is the interpretation — which specific axes carry the most weight for entity A versus entity B, and which differences are large enough to influence a real decision.
Practical use of the comparison: read the data above, then drill into the individual entity A and entity B detail pages for the underlying breakdown. A pairwise comparison answers the relative question; the per-entity pages answer the absolute question.
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.