Aurora, IL vs Naperville, IL
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Summary
Naperville spends 2.9% more per capita than Aurora ($450/person difference). Aurora, IL has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 87/100).
Fiscal Health Score
A
87/100
Budget Balance100
Debt Burden91
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency89
Revenue Diversity100
Trend Direction50
D
45/100
Budget Balance24
Debt Burden27
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency87
Revenue Diversity0
Trend Direction50
Key Metrics
Metric
Aurora
Naperville
Total Spending
$2.8B
$2.3B
Spending / Capita
$15,301
$15,751
Total Revenue
$8.3B
$1.0B
Revenue / Capita
$45,546
$6,975
Total Debt
$88.7M
$153.2M
Debt / Capita
$489
$1,028
Population
181,405
149,089
Gov Employees / 10K
0.0
0.0
Avg Gov Salary
$0
$0
Per Capita Spending by Department
Fire Protection
Aurora$216
Naperville$0
Parks & Recreation
Aurora$494
Naperville$544
Health
Aurora$0
Naperville$1,028
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
AuroraNaperville
| Sales Tax | $114 | $0 |
| Income Tax | $144 | $0 |
| Intergovernmental | $2,481 | $458 |
| Charges & Fees | $2,224 | $4,765 |
| Other | $1,114 | $2,388 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
AuroraNaperville
| Fire Protection | $216 | $0 |
| Public Welfare | $922 | $0 |
| Health | $0 | $1,028 |
| Hospitals | $257 | $0 |
| Parks & Recreation | $494 | $544 |
| Housing | $4,836 | $0 |
| Utilities | $2,366 | $4,527 |
| Other | $6,210 | $9,652 |
A
Aurora, IL
Fiscal Health Score: 87/100
Excellent fiscal health
D
Naperville, IL
Fiscal Health Score: 45/100
Below average fiscal health