Aurora, IL vs Elgin, IL
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Aurora, IL and Elgin, IL spend within 7.5% of each other per resident — $15,301 versus $14,229 — so on the headline spending-per-capita measure the two cities are effectively neck and neck.
Aurora, IL holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 87/100 (grade A) against 58/100 (grade C) for Elgin, IL — a 29-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
On debt, Aurora, IL carries the lighter load at $489 per resident versus $617 for Elgin, IL. Both cities pour the most per-resident dollars into the same function: parks and recreation leads in Aurora, IL at $494 per resident and in Elgin, IL at $1,641.
They also fund themselves differently: intergovernmental transfers is the largest single revenue source in Aurora, IL at 5% of total revenue, whereas Elgin, IL relies most on charges and fees at 43%.
Summary
Aurora spends 7.5% more per capita than Elgin ($1,072/person difference). Aurora, IL has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 87/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Sales Tax | $114 | $754 |
| Income Tax | $144 | $651 |
| Intergovernmental | $2,481 | $1,170 |
| Charges & Fees | $2,224 | $2,267 |
| Other | $1,114 | $1,754 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $216 | $222 |
| Highways & Roads | $0 | $116 |
| Education | $0 | $53 |
| Public Welfare | $922 | $718 |
| Hospitals | $257 | $0 |
| Parks & Recreation | $494 | $1,641 |
| Housing | $4,836 | $4,472 |
| Utilities | $2,366 | $2,850 |
| Other | $6,210 | $4,159 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.