Skip to main content
Data from U.S. Census Bureau · 2026 · Methodology
CitySpend

South San Francisco, CA

Population: 65,596 (2022) · Small Cities (50K–100K)

B
65/100

Good fiscal health — above-average across most metrics

Total Spending
$2.2B
Per Capita
$33,936
Total Revenue
$3.2B
Total Debt
$0

Spending Breakdown

Parks & Recreation
31.4%$698.0M
Other
27.1%$603.5M
Public Welfare
19.2%$426.9M
Housing & Community Development
16.4%$364.9M
Health
2.9%$64.8M
Sewerage
2.0%$44.8M
Hospitals
1.0%$22.1M
Utilities
0.0%$992K

Spending data sourced from the Census Bureau's Annual Survey of State & Local Government Finances. Per-capita comparisons use the Lincoln Institute's Fiscally Standardized Cities methodology for fair cross-city benchmarking.

Revenue Sources

Sales Tax
1.6%$50.5M
Income Tax
0.1%$2.0M
Intergovernmental
100.0%$3.2B
Other
13.8%$439.1M

Per Capita Spending by Department

Parks & Recreation$10,641/person
Health$987/person

Score Breakdown

Budget Balance & Reserves (25%)100/100
Debt Burden (20%)100/100
Pension Funding (20%)76/100
Spending Efficiency (15%)0/100
Revenue Diversity (10%)0/100
Trend Direction (10%)50/100

Compare Cities

See how South San Francisco stacks up against another city.

vs Los Angeles, CAvs San Diego, CAvs San Jose, CA
Data source: U.S. Census Bureau, Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances (2023). Population from American Community Survey.

Other Cities in California

Frequently Asked Questions

South San Francisco, CA spends $33,936 per resident, based on total expenditures of $2.2B for a population of 65,596. The city has a Fiscal Health Score of B (65/100).

South San Francisco, CA has total expenditures of $2.2B and total revenue of $3.2B. The city carries $0 in total debt, based on Census Bureau data from 2023.

South San Francisco, CA employs 0 government workers, of which 0 are full-time. The average government salary is $0, with 0.0 employees per 10,000 residents.

South San Francisco, CA has a Fiscal Health Score of B (65/100). This score evaluates budget balance, debt burden, pension funding, spending efficiency, revenue diversity, and 3-year fiscal trajectory compared to peer cities of similar population.