Skip to main content
Data from U.S. Census Bureau · 2026 · Methodology
CitySpend

Rancho Cucamonga, CA

Population: 174,696 (2022) · Mid-Size Cities (100K–250K)

C
59/100

Average fiscal health — some areas of concern

Total Spending
$2.3B
Per Capita
$12,967
Total Revenue
$580.5M
Total Debt
$0

Spending Breakdown

Other
56.5%$1.3B
Housing & Community Development
20.2%$457.7M
Public Welfare
9.6%$217.0M
Sewerage
5.9%$133.4M
Parks & Recreation
5.1%$116.6M
Health
1.9%$42.1M
Utilities
0.6%$13.1M
Hospitals
0.3%$6.1M

Spending data sourced from the Census Bureau's Annual Survey of State & Local Government Finances. Per-capita comparisons use the Lincoln Institute's Fiscally Standardized Cities methodology for fair cross-city benchmarking.

Revenue Sources

Sales Tax
2.8%$16.4M
Intergovernmental
100.0%$580.5M
Other
37.3%$216.6M

Per Capita Spending by Department

Parks & Recreation$667/person
Health$241/person

Score Breakdown

Budget Balance & Reserves (25%)17/100
Debt Burden (20%)100/100
Pension Funding (20%)76/100
Spending Efficiency (15%)100/100
Revenue Diversity (10%)0/100
Trend Direction (10%)50/100

Compare Cities

See how Rancho Cucamonga stacks up against another city.

vs Los Angeles, CAvs San Diego, CAvs San Jose, CA
Data source: U.S. Census Bureau, Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances (2023). Population from American Community Survey.

Other Cities in California

Frequently Asked Questions

Rancho Cucamonga, CA spends $12,967 per resident, based on total expenditures of $2.3B for a population of 174,696. The city has a Fiscal Health Score of C (59/100).

Rancho Cucamonga, CA has total expenditures of $2.3B and total revenue of $580.5M. The city carries $0 in total debt, based on Census Bureau data from 2023.

Rancho Cucamonga, CA employs 0 government workers, of which 0 are full-time. The average government salary is $0, with 0.0 employees per 10,000 residents.

Rancho Cucamonga, CA has a Fiscal Health Score of C (59/100). This score evaluates budget balance, debt burden, pension funding, spending efficiency, revenue diversity, and 3-year fiscal trajectory compared to peer cities of similar population.