Skip to main content
Data from U.S. Census Bureau · 2026 · Methodology
CitySpend

Pomona, CA

Population: 149,831 (2022) · Mid-Size Cities (100K–250K)

B
76/100

Good fiscal health — above-average across most metrics

Total Spending
$2.7B
Per Capita
$17,754
Total Revenue
$5.1B
Total Debt
$0

Spending Breakdown

Other
35.0%$931.0M
Housing & Community Development
26.8%$714.0M
Utilities
15.2%$404.8M
Hospitals
12.7%$338.4M
Public Welfare
5.6%$149.5M
Parks & Recreation
1.5%$40.3M
Sewerage
1.4%$36.9M
Interest on Debt
1.2%$30.7M
Health
0.5%$14.6M

Spending data sourced from the Census Bureau's Annual Survey of State & Local Government Finances. Per-capita comparisons use the Lincoln Institute's Fiscally Standardized Cities methodology for fair cross-city benchmarking.

Revenue Sources

Sales Tax
0.5%$23.4M
Income Tax
2.5%$127.1M
Intergovernmental
100.0%$5.1B
Charges & Fees
8.1%$415.3M
Other
4.4%$222.1M

Per Capita Spending by Department

Parks & Recreation$269/person
Health$97/person

Score Breakdown

Budget Balance & Reserves (25%)100/100
Debt Burden (20%)100/100
Pension Funding (20%)76/100
Spending Efficiency (15%)75/100
Revenue Diversity (10%)0/100
Trend Direction (10%)50/100

Compare Cities

See how Pomona stacks up against another city.

vs Los Angeles, CAvs San Diego, CAvs San Jose, CA
Data source: U.S. Census Bureau, Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances (2023). Population from American Community Survey.

Other Cities in California

Frequently Asked Questions

Pomona, CA spends $17,754 per resident, based on total expenditures of $2.7B for a population of 149,831. The city has a Fiscal Health Score of B (76/100).

Pomona, CA has total expenditures of $2.7B and total revenue of $5.1B. The city carries $0 in total debt, based on Census Bureau data from 2023.

Pomona, CA employs 0 government workers, of which 0 are full-time. The average government salary is $0, with 0.0 employees per 10,000 residents.

Pomona, CA has a Fiscal Health Score of B (76/100). This score evaluates budget balance, debt burden, pension funding, spending efficiency, revenue diversity, and 3-year fiscal trajectory compared to peer cities of similar population.