Skip to main content
Data from U.S. Census Bureau · 2026 · Methodology
CitySpend

Petaluma, CA

Population: 59,682 (2022) · Small Cities (50K–100K)

C
62/100

Average fiscal health — some areas of concern

Total Spending
$1.2B
Per Capita
$20,531
Total Revenue
$1.2B
Total Debt
$0

Spending Breakdown

Other
25.3%$310.2M
Housing & Community Development
22.8%$279.9M
Public Welfare
19.9%$243.6M
Utilities
12.7%$155.9M
Interest on Debt
7.3%$89.0M
Parks & Recreation
7.0%$86.0M
Hospitals
4.9%$60.3M
Health
0.0%$492K

Spending data sourced from the Census Bureau's Annual Survey of State & Local Government Finances. Per-capita comparisons use the Lincoln Institute's Fiscally Standardized Cities methodology for fair cross-city benchmarking.

Revenue Sources

Property Tax
0.2%$1.9M
Sales Tax
0.6%$6.8M
Intergovernmental
17.1%$199.1M
Charges & Fees
16.4%$191.4M
Other
36.6%$427.4M

Per Capita Spending by Department

Parks & Recreation$1,441/person
Health$8/person

Score Breakdown

Budget Balance & Reserves (25%)23/100
Debt Burden (20%)100/100
Pension Funding (20%)76/100
Spending Efficiency (15%)47/100
Revenue Diversity (10%)86/100
Trend Direction (10%)50/100

Compare Cities

See how Petaluma stacks up against another city.

vs Los Angeles, CAvs San Diego, CAvs San Jose, CA
Data source: U.S. Census Bureau, Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances (2023). Population from American Community Survey.

Other Cities in California

Frequently Asked Questions

Petaluma, CA spends $20,531 per resident, based on total expenditures of $1.2B for a population of 59,682. The city has a Fiscal Health Score of C (62/100).

Petaluma, CA has total expenditures of $1.2B and total revenue of $1.2B. The city carries $0 in total debt, based on Census Bureau data from 2023.

Petaluma, CA employs 0 government workers, of which 0 are full-time. The average government salary is $0, with 0.0 employees per 10,000 residents.

Petaluma, CA has a Fiscal Health Score of C (62/100). This score evaluates budget balance, debt burden, pension funding, spending efficiency, revenue diversity, and 3-year fiscal trajectory compared to peer cities of similar population.