Skip to main content
Data from U.S. Census Bureau · 2026 · Methodology
CitySpend

Greenwood, IN

Population: 63,579 (2022) · Small Cities (50K–100K)

A
88/100

Excellent fiscal health — strong reserves, low debt, well-funded pensions

Total Spending
$930.5M
Per Capita
$14,636
Total Revenue
$1.6B
Total Debt
$0

Spending Breakdown

Other
77.6%$721.8M
Housing & Community Development
7.7%$71.4M
Parks & Recreation
6.2%$57.6M
Public Welfare
4.3%$40.4M
Utilities
3.9%$36.5M
Fire Protection
0.3%$2.8M

Spending data sourced from the Census Bureau's Annual Survey of State & Local Government Finances. Per-capita comparisons use the Lincoln Institute's Fiscally Standardized Cities methodology for fair cross-city benchmarking.

Revenue Sources

Sales Tax
2.5%$41.5M
Income Tax
2.2%$36.4M
Intergovernmental
10.4%$171.4M
Other
19.3%$316.4M

Per Capita Spending by Department

Fire Protection$43/person
Parks & Recreation$907/person

Score Breakdown

Budget Balance & Reserves (25%)100/100
Debt Burden (20%)100/100
Pension Funding (20%)76/100
Spending Efficiency (15%)85/100
Revenue Diversity (10%)100/100
Trend Direction (10%)50/100

Compare Cities

See how Greenwood stacks up against another city.

vs Indianapolis city (balance), INvs Fort Wayne, INvs Evansville, IN
Data source: U.S. Census Bureau, Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances (2023). Population from American Community Survey.

Other Cities in Indiana

Frequently Asked Questions

Greenwood, IN spends $14,636 per resident, based on total expenditures of $930.5M for a population of 63,579. The city has a Fiscal Health Score of A (88/100).

Greenwood, IN has total expenditures of $930.5M and total revenue of $1.6B. The city carries $0 in total debt, based on Census Bureau data from 2023.

Greenwood, IN employs 0 government workers, of which 0 are full-time. The average government salary is $0, with 0.0 employees per 10,000 residents.

Greenwood, IN has a Fiscal Health Score of A (88/100). This score evaluates budget balance, debt burden, pension funding, spending efficiency, revenue diversity, and 3-year fiscal trajectory compared to peer cities of similar population.