Skip to main content
Data from U.S. Census Bureau · 2026 · Methodology
CitySpend

Clovis, CA

Population: 120,607 (2022) · Mid-Size Cities (100K–250K)

C
61/100

Average fiscal health — some areas of concern

Total Spending
$1.7B
Per Capita
$14,328
Total Revenue
$1.6B
Total Debt
$0

Spending Breakdown

Other
27.9%$482.2M
Housing & Community Development
27.0%$466.0M
Utilities
24.7%$427.3M
Interest on Debt
9.0%$155.5M
Public Welfare
6.0%$102.9M
Fire Protection
2.1%$35.5M
Parks & Recreation
2.0%$34.9M
Hospitals
1.4%$23.8M

Spending data sourced from the Census Bureau's Annual Survey of State & Local Government Finances. Per-capita comparisons use the Lincoln Institute's Fiscally Standardized Cities methodology for fair cross-city benchmarking.

Revenue Sources

Sales Tax
0.4%$7.0M
Income Tax
15.0%$246.7M
Intergovernmental
100.0%$1.6B
Charges & Fees
16.7%$274.5M
Other
33.2%$546.0M

Per Capita Spending by Department

Fire Protection$294/person
Parks & Recreation$290/person

Score Breakdown

Budget Balance & Reserves (25%)26/100
Debt Burden (20%)100/100
Pension Funding (20%)76/100
Spending Efficiency (15%)95/100
Revenue Diversity (10%)0/100
Trend Direction (10%)50/100

Compare Cities

See how Clovis stacks up against another city.

vs Los Angeles, CAvs San Diego, CAvs San Jose, CA
Data source: U.S. Census Bureau, Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances (2023). Population from American Community Survey.

Other Cities in California

Frequently Asked Questions

Clovis, CA spends $14,328 per resident, based on total expenditures of $1.7B for a population of 120,607. The city has a Fiscal Health Score of C (61/100).

Clovis, CA has total expenditures of $1.7B and total revenue of $1.6B. The city carries $0 in total debt, based on Census Bureau data from 2023.

Clovis, CA employs 0 government workers, of which 0 are full-time. The average government salary is $0, with 0.0 employees per 10,000 residents.

Clovis, CA has a Fiscal Health Score of C (61/100). This score evaluates budget balance, debt burden, pension funding, spending efficiency, revenue diversity, and 3-year fiscal trajectory compared to peer cities of similar population.