Skip to main content
Data from U.S. Census Bureau · 2026 · Methodology
CitySpend

Carlsbad, CA

Population: 114,745 (2022) · Mid-Size Cities (100K–250K)

D
46/100

Below average — significant fiscal challenges in multiple areas

Total Spending
$3.0B
Per Capita
$26,553
Total Revenue
$539.2M
Total Debt
$0

Spending Breakdown

Utilities
33.4%$1.0B
Other
20.3%$617.4M
Housing & Community Development
17.0%$518.6M
Parks & Recreation
10.2%$309.7M
Hospitals
8.2%$248.6M
Health
4.5%$135.9M
Public Welfare
4.5%$135.6M
Sewerage
2.1%$63.6M

Spending data sourced from the Census Bureau's Annual Survey of State & Local Government Finances. Per-capita comparisons use the Lincoln Institute's Fiscally Standardized Cities methodology for fair cross-city benchmarking.

Revenue Sources

Sales Tax
26.2%$141.4M
Income Tax
5.2%$28.0M
Intergovernmental
30.1%$162.4M
Charges & Fees
173.9%$937.5M
Other
57.9%$311.9M

Per Capita Spending by Department

Parks & Recreation$2,699/person
Health$1,185/person

Score Breakdown

Budget Balance & Reserves (25%)8/100
Debt Burden (20%)100/100
Pension Funding (20%)76/100
Spending Efficiency (15%)23/100
Revenue Diversity (10%)0/100
Trend Direction (10%)50/100

Compare Cities

See how Carlsbad stacks up against another city.

vs Los Angeles, CAvs San Diego, CAvs San Jose, CA
Data source: U.S. Census Bureau, Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances (2023). Population from American Community Survey.

Other Cities in California

Frequently Asked Questions

Carlsbad, CA spends $26,553 per resident, based on total expenditures of $3.0B for a population of 114,745. The city has a Fiscal Health Score of D (46/100).

Carlsbad, CA has total expenditures of $3.0B and total revenue of $539.2M. The city carries $0 in total debt, based on Census Bureau data from 2023.

Carlsbad, CA employs 0 government workers, of which 0 are full-time. The average government salary is $0, with 0.0 employees per 10,000 residents.

Carlsbad, CA has a Fiscal Health Score of D (46/100). This score evaluates budget balance, debt burden, pension funding, spending efficiency, revenue diversity, and 3-year fiscal trajectory compared to peer cities of similar population.