Skip to main content
Data from U.S. Census Bureau · 2026 · Methodology
CitySpend

Updated April 2026 · U.S. Census Bureau, fiscal year 2022

Is Atascocita, TX in Financial Trouble?

Not yet, but Atascocita, TX bears watching. Its C grade (50/100) is a middle-of-the-pack reading: the city is meeting today's obligations, but at least one structural factor, debt, pension funding, or thin reserves, is flashing a caution signal that could tighten budgets over the next two to three years.

Atascocita, TX Budget Snapshot

Total Spending$0
Per Capita Spending$0
Total Revenue$0
Total Debt$0
Debt Per Capita$0
Population89,121
Fiscal Health Score50/100 (C)
Data YearFY 2022

Fiscal Health Score Breakdown

Atascocita's C grade is the weighted average of six factors, each scored 0–100. Its strongest input is Budget Balance & Reserves (50/100); its weakest is Budget Balance & Reserves (50/100). The weakest factor is where budget pressure is most likely to surface first.

Budget Balance & Reserves (25% weight)50/100
Debt Burden (per capita vs peers) (20% weight)50/100
Pension Funding Ratio (20% weight)50/100
Spending Efficiency (15% weight)50/100
Revenue Diversity (10% weight)50/100
3-Year Trend Direction (10% weight)50/100

What Does the C Grade Mean?

Atascocita, TX earns a C on the CitySpend Fiscal Health Score (50/100). The city is meeting current obligations but is exposed on at least one structural front, debt service, pension funding shortfalls, or thin reserves, that warrants close watching over the next two to three budget cycles.

Debt Burden in Context

Debt-wise, Atascocita sits close to the peer median for cities its size: $0 per resident versus a peer-group median of $0. That tracks with normal capital-program borrowing for streets, water, and public buildings.

Where the Money Comes From

How This Score Is Calculated

The CitySpend Fiscal Health Score combines six factors into one composite, drawn from the U.S. Census Bureau Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances: budget balance and reserves (25%), debt burden per capita versus peer median (20%), pension funded ratio from the Public Plans Database (20%), spending efficiency (15%), revenue diversity (10%), and three-year trend direction (10%). Best-practice weighting follows guidance from the Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA). Read the full methodology.

Not yet, but Atascocita, TX bears watching. Its C grade (50/100) is a middle-of-the-pack reading: the city is meeting today's obligations, but at least one structural factor, debt, pension funding, or thin reserves, is flashing a caution signal that could tighten budgets over the next two to three years.

This answer pulls from the Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, the authoritative federal source for U.S. municipal and county government finances. The headline number above is the direct answer; what follows is the additional context most readers need to use the answer for a real decision rather than just a fact lookup.

For readers turning this answer into action: cross-reference against the underlying the Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances record before acting on time-sensitive decisions. The site renders the data as it was published; subsequent revisions can shift the picture, and the live federal data is always the authoritative current reference.