Worcester, MA vs New Bedford, MA
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Summary
New Bedford spends 14.6% more per capita than Worcester ($7,167/person difference). Worcester, MA has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (C, 58/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Sales Tax | $457 | $123 |
| Income Tax | $231 | $5 |
| Intergovernmental | $4,140 | $7,480 |
| Charges & Fees | $1,465 | $1,982 |
| Other | $3,233 | $4,106 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $186 | $252 |
| Highways & Roads | $163 | $886 |
| Education | $28,887 | $31,923 |
| Public Welfare | $889 | $708 |
| Health | $349 | $255 |
| Hospitals | $534 | $610 |
| Parks & Recreation | $461 | $315 |
| Housing | $2,901 | $2,315 |
| Sewerage | $209 | $99 |
| Utilities | $1,046 | $887 |
| Other | $6,424 | $10,966 |
Compare More Cities
The side-by-side above pulls the the Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances data for both entity A and entity B. What follows is the interpretation — which specific axes carry the most weight for entity A versus entity B, and which differences are large enough to influence a real decision.
Practical use of the comparison: read the data above, then drill into the individual entity A and entity B detail pages for the underlying breakdown. A pairwise comparison answers the relative question; the per-entity pages answer the absolute question.
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.