Wichita, KS vs San Diego, CA
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
San Diego, CA outspends Wichita, KS by a wide margin per resident — $43,306 versus $7,986, a 442% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Wichita, KS holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 90/100 (grade A) against 53/100 (grade C) for San Diego, CA — a 37-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
San Diego, CA reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Wichita, KS carries $132 per resident. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Wichita, KS leads with parks and recreation at $874 per resident, while San Diego, CA leads with police at $3,335.
They also fund themselves differently: intergovernmental transfers is the largest single revenue source in Wichita, KS at 14% of total revenue, whereas San Diego, CA relies most on other revenue at 39%.
Summary
San Diego spends 81.6% more per capita than Wichita ($35,320/person difference). Wichita, KS has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 90/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $0 | $124 |
| Sales Tax | $246 | $63 |
| Income Tax | $57 | $194 |
| Intergovernmental | $3,895 | $57 |
| Charges & Fees | $3,193 | $14 |
| Other | $2,783 | $3,801 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $0 | $3,335 |
| Fire Protection | $152 | $1,278 |
| Highways & Roads | $126 | $1,408 |
| Education | $2 | $2,005 |
| Public Welfare | $441 | $700 |
| Health | $254 | $411 |
| Hospitals | $113 | $0 |
| Parks & Recreation | $874 | $436 |
| Housing | $2,618 | $4,476 |
| Sewerage | $0 | $43 |
| Utilities | $1,225 | $11,704 |
| Interest on Debt | $70 | $0 |
| Other | $2,111 | $17,509 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.