Wichita, KS vs Overland Park, KS
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Overland Park, KS and Wichita, KS spend within 0.7% of each other per resident — $8,044 versus $7,986 — so on the headline spending-per-capita measure the two cities are effectively neck and neck.
Wichita, KS edges Overland Park, KS on the Fiscal Health Score by 5 points — 90/100 (grade A) to 85/100 (grade A). At a margin this narrow the grade is close enough that the factor-level detail matters more than the composite.
Overland Park, KS reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Wichita, KS carries $132 per resident. Both cities pour the most per-resident dollars into the same function: parks and recreation leads in Wichita, KS at $874 per resident and in Overland Park, KS at $1,786.
On the revenue side both lean hardest on intergovernmental transfers — 14% of total revenue in Wichita, KS and 10% in Overland Park, KS.
Summary
Overland Park spends 0.7% more per capita than Wichita ($58/person difference). Wichita, KS has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 90/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Sales Tax | $246 | $861 |
| Income Tax | $57 | $0 |
| Intergovernmental | $3,895 | $1,045 |
| Charges & Fees | $3,193 | $0 |
| Other | $2,783 | $804 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $152 | $93 |
| Highways & Roads | $126 | $225 |
| Education | $2 | $0 |
| Public Welfare | $441 | $726 |
| Health | $254 | $0 |
| Hospitals | $113 | $427 |
| Parks & Recreation | $874 | $1,786 |
| Housing | $2,618 | $2,095 |
| Utilities | $1,225 | $0 |
| Interest on Debt | $70 | $0 |
| Other | $2,111 | $2,690 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.