Wichita, KS vs Oakland, CA
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Oakland, CA outspends Wichita, KS by a wide margin per resident — $30,055 versus $7,986, a 276% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Wichita, KS holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 90/100 (grade A) against 72/100 (grade B) for Oakland, CA — a 18-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
Oakland, CA reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Wichita, KS carries $132 per resident. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Wichita, KS leads with parks and recreation at $874 per resident, while Oakland, CA leads with health at $1,016.
On the revenue side both lean hardest on intergovernmental transfers — 14% of total revenue in Wichita, KS and 100% in Oakland, CA.
Summary
Oakland spends 73.4% more per capita than Wichita ($22,069/person difference). Wichita, KS has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 90/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Sales Tax | $246 | $522 |
| Income Tax | $57 | $0 |
| Intergovernmental | $3,895 | $42,277 |
| Charges & Fees | $3,193 | $0 |
| Other | $2,783 | $4,337 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $152 | $1 |
| Highways & Roads | $126 | $0 |
| Education | $2 | $0 |
| Public Welfare | $441 | $2,426 |
| Health | $254 | $1,016 |
| Hospitals | $113 | $2,498 |
| Parks & Recreation | $874 | $955 |
| Housing | $2,618 | $7,811 |
| Sewerage | $0 | $1,417 |
| Utilities | $1,225 | $0 |
| Interest on Debt | $70 | $0 |
| Other | $2,111 | $13,929 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.