Wichita, KS vs Lenexa, KS
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Lenexa, KS outspends Wichita, KS by a wide margin per resident — $13,108 versus $7,986, a 64% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Wichita, KS edges Lenexa, KS on the Fiscal Health Score by 1 points — 90/100 (grade A) to 89/100 (grade A). At a margin this narrow the grade is close enough that the factor-level detail matters more than the composite.
Lenexa, KS reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Wichita, KS carries $132 per resident. Both cities pour the most per-resident dollars into the same function: parks and recreation leads in Wichita, KS at $874 per resident and in Lenexa, KS at $1,883.
They also fund themselves differently: intergovernmental transfers is the largest single revenue source in Wichita, KS at 14% of total revenue, whereas Lenexa, KS relies most on other revenue at 15%.
Summary
Lenexa spends 39.1% more per capita than Wichita ($5,122/person difference). Wichita, KS has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 90/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Sales Tax | $246 | $0 |
| Income Tax | $57 | $0 |
| Intergovernmental | $3,895 | $1,550 |
| Charges & Fees | $3,193 | $0 |
| Other | $2,783 | $4,178 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $152 | $270 |
| Highways & Roads | $126 | $0 |
| Education | $2 | $0 |
| Public Welfare | $441 | $2,574 |
| Health | $254 | $0 |
| Hospitals | $113 | $0 |
| Parks & Recreation | $874 | $1,883 |
| Housing | $2,618 | $3,278 |
| Utilities | $1,225 | $0 |
| Interest on Debt | $70 | $0 |
| Other | $2,111 | $5,103 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.