Waukesha, WI vs Oshkosh, WI
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Waukesha, WI outspends Oshkosh, WI by a wide margin per resident — $38,315 versus $14,411, a 166% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Oshkosh, WI holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 88/100 (grade A) against 53/100 (grade C) for Waukesha, WI — a 35-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
Neither city reports outstanding debt per resident in its current Census filing, which removes debt service as a point of difference between them. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Waukesha, WI leads with police at $2,927 per resident, while Oshkosh, WI leads with parks and recreation at $1,346.
On the revenue side both lean hardest on intergovernmental transfers — 27% of total revenue in Waukesha, WI and 17% in Oshkosh, WI.
Summary
Waukesha spends 165.9% more per capita than Oshkosh ($23,904/person difference). Oshkosh, WI has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 88/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $1 | $1,987 |
| Sales Tax | $891 | $107 |
| Income Tax | $0 | $154 |
| Intergovernmental | $3,249 | $14,094 |
| Charges & Fees | $0 | $2,241 |
| Other | $2,389 | $3,339 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $2,927 | $0 |
| Fire Protection | $856 | $173 |
| Highways & Roads | $1,204 | $127 |
| Education | $0 | $56 |
| Public Welfare | $1,186 | $1,718 |
| Health | $523 | $601 |
| Hospitals | $0 | $113 |
| Parks & Recreation | $1,677 | $1,346 |
| Housing | $4,755 | $2,296 |
| Utilities | $6,106 | $1,997 |
| Interest on Debt | $88 | $1,027 |
| Other | $18,994 | $4,956 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.