Washington, DC vs Tulsa, OK
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Washington, DC outspends Tulsa, OK by a wide margin per resident — $243,341 versus $5,250, a 4535% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Tulsa, OK holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 56/100 (grade C) against 41/100 (grade D) for Washington, DC — a 15-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
Tulsa, OK reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Washington, DC carries $2,516 per resident. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Washington, DC leads with education at $53,224 per resident, while Tulsa, OK leads with health at $762.
Summary
Washington spends 4534.9% more per capita than Tulsa ($238,091/person difference). Tulsa, OK has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (C, 56/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $25 | $0 |
| Sales Tax | $991 | $97 |
| Income Tax | $141 | $0 |
| Intergovernmental | $18,754 | $0 |
| Charges & Fees | $4,070 | $0 |
| Other | $11,518 | $53 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $4,183 | $628 |
| Fire Protection | $4,262 | $196 |
| Highways & Roads | $1,435 | $257 |
| Education | $53,224 | $0 |
| Public Welfare | $2,498 | $86 |
| Health | $1,009 | $762 |
| Hospitals | $17,668 | $0 |
| Parks & Recreation | $5,459 | $154 |
| Housing | $10,296 | $350 |
| Sewerage | $2,881 | $27 |
| Utilities | $88,990 | $41 |
| Interest on Debt | $58 | $0 |
| General Admin | $3,225 | $0 |
| Other | $48,155 | $2,748 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.