Washington, DC vs Tucson, AZ
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Washington, DC outspends Tucson, AZ by a wide margin per resident — $243,341 versus $15,759, a 1444% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Tucson, AZ holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 55/100 (grade C) against 41/100 (grade D) for Washington, DC — a 14-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
On debt, Tucson, AZ carries the lighter load at $1,540 per resident versus $2,516 for Washington, DC. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Washington, DC leads with education at $53,224 per resident, while Tucson, AZ leads with parks and recreation at $1,229.
On the revenue side both lean hardest on intergovernmental transfers — 7% of total revenue in Washington, DC and 100% in Tucson, AZ.
Summary
Washington spends 1444.1% more per capita than Tucson ($227,582/person difference). Tucson, AZ has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (C, 55/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $25 | $5 |
| Sales Tax | $991 | $309 |
| Income Tax | $141 | $1,107 |
| Intergovernmental | $18,754 | $23,276 |
| Charges & Fees | $4,070 | $4,534 |
| Other | $11,518 | $952 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $4,183 | $0 |
| Fire Protection | $4,262 | $330 |
| Highways & Roads | $1,435 | $0 |
| Education | $53,224 | $0 |
| Public Welfare | $2,498 | $1,181 |
| Health | $1,009 | $0 |
| Hospitals | $17,668 | $1,314 |
| Parks & Recreation | $5,459 | $1,229 |
| Housing | $10,296 | $3,091 |
| Sewerage | $2,881 | $0 |
| Utilities | $88,990 | $3,555 |
| Interest on Debt | $58 | $1,735 |
| General Admin | $3,225 | $0 |
| Other | $48,155 | $3,322 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.