Washington, DC vs Bakersfield, CA
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Washington, DC outspends Bakersfield, CA by a wide margin per resident — $243,341 versus $11,576, a 2002% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Bakersfield, CA holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 56/100 (grade C) against 41/100 (grade D) for Washington, DC — a 15-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
Bakersfield, CA reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Washington, DC carries $2,516 per resident. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Washington, DC leads with education at $53,224 per resident, while Bakersfield, CA leads with parks and recreation at $741.
On the revenue side both lean hardest on intergovernmental transfers — 7% of total revenue in Washington, DC and 100% in Bakersfield, CA.
Summary
Washington spends 2002.2% more per capita than Bakersfield ($231,765/person difference). Bakersfield, CA has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (C, 56/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $25 | $1 |
| Sales Tax | $991 | $20 |
| Income Tax | $141 | $1,909 |
| Intergovernmental | $18,754 | $3,862 |
| Charges & Fees | $4,070 | $1,024 |
| Other | $11,518 | $1,915 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $4,183 | $0 |
| Fire Protection | $4,262 | $0 |
| Highways & Roads | $1,435 | $0 |
| Education | $53,224 | $0 |
| Public Welfare | $2,498 | $840 |
| Health | $1,009 | $0 |
| Hospitals | $17,668 | $425 |
| Parks & Recreation | $5,459 | $741 |
| Housing | $10,296 | $3,391 |
| Sewerage | $2,881 | $265 |
| Utilities | $88,990 | $2,679 |
| Interest on Debt | $58 | $0 |
| General Admin | $3,225 | $0 |
| Other | $48,155 | $3,234 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.