Vancouver, WA vs Everett, WA
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Everett, WA outspends Vancouver, WA by a wide margin per resident — $26,447 versus $13,434, a 97% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Everett, WA holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 67/100 (grade B) against 45/100 (grade D) for Vancouver, WA — a 22-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
On debt, Everett, WA carries the lighter load at $141 per resident versus $866 for Vancouver, WA. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Vancouver, WA leads with parks and recreation at $871 per resident, while Everett, WA leads with fire protection at $1,790.
On the revenue side both lean hardest on other revenue — 114% of total revenue in Vancouver, WA and 24% in Everett, WA.
Summary
Everett spends 49.2% more per capita than Vancouver ($13,013/person difference). Everett, WA has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 67/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $31 | $0 |
| Sales Tax | $456 | $362 |
| Income Tax | $140 | $235 |
| Intergovernmental | $141 | $4,248 |
| Charges & Fees | $2,641 | $4,469 |
| Other | $6,500 | $6,125 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $0 | $290 |
| Fire Protection | $0 | $1,790 |
| Highways & Roads | $0 | $251 |
| Education | $3 | $0 |
| Public Welfare | $968 | $714 |
| Health | $0 | $379 |
| Hospitals | $661 | $284 |
| Parks & Recreation | $871 | $1,098 |
| Housing | $3,594 | $3,492 |
| Sewerage | $241 | $268 |
| Utilities | $2,481 | $6,827 |
| Interest on Debt | $0 | $2,198 |
| Other | $4,615 | $8,856 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.