Tuscaloosa, AL vs Birmingham, AL
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Birmingham, AL outspends Tuscaloosa, AL by a wide margin per resident — $30,790 versus $10,894, a 183% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
On the CitySpend Fiscal Health Score the two are level: Tuscaloosa, AL and Birmingham, AL both land at 55/100 (grade C and C respectively), so the deciding factors sit in the underlying six-factor breakdown rather than the rolled-up grade.
Tuscaloosa, AL reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Birmingham, AL carries $2,823 per resident. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Tuscaloosa, AL leads with police at $1,260 per resident, while Birmingham, AL leads with parks and recreation at $1,823.
Summary
Birmingham spends 64.6% more per capita than Tuscaloosa ($19,896/person difference). Both cities share the same Fiscal Health Score.
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $2 | $44 |
| Sales Tax | $0 | $281 |
| Intergovernmental | $0 | $468 |
| Charges & Fees | $0 | $10,460 |
| Other | $791 | $734 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $1,260 | $22 |
| Fire Protection | $1,043 | $1,152 |
| Highways & Roads | $0 | $848 |
| Public Welfare | $2,419 | $2,110 |
| Health | $540 | $683 |
| Hospitals | $0 | $1,505 |
| Parks & Recreation | $375 | $1,823 |
| Housing | $1,916 | $5,487 |
| Sewerage | $0 | $594 |
| Utilities | $88 | $5,451 |
| Other | $3,252 | $11,115 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.