Tulsa, OK vs San Antonio, TX
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
San Antonio, TX outspends Tulsa, OK by a wide margin per resident — $16,943 versus $5,250, a 223% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
San Antonio, TX holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 68/100 (grade B) against 56/100 (grade C) for Tulsa, OK — a 12-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
Tulsa, OK reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while San Antonio, TX carries $2,131 per resident. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Tulsa, OK leads with health at $762 per resident, while San Antonio, TX leads with parks and recreation at $1,045.
Summary
San Antonio spends 69.0% more per capita than Tulsa ($11,692/person difference). San Antonio, TX has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 68/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $0 | $9 |
| Sales Tax | $97 | $293 |
| Income Tax | $0 | $1,000 |
| Intergovernmental | $0 | $14,312 |
| Charges & Fees | $0 | $4,025 |
| Other | $53 | $3,184 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $628 | $0 |
| Fire Protection | $196 | $396 |
| Highways & Roads | $257 | $158 |
| Education | $0 | $23 |
| Public Welfare | $86 | $1,188 |
| Health | $762 | $293 |
| Hospitals | $0 | $993 |
| Parks & Recreation | $154 | $1,045 |
| Housing | $350 | $3,570 |
| Sewerage | $27 | $100 |
| Utilities | $41 | $3,826 |
| Other | $2,748 | $5,352 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.