Tulsa, OK vs San Antonio, TX
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Summary
San Antonio spends 69.0% more per capita than Tulsa ($11,692/person difference). San Antonio, TX has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 68/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $0 | $9 |
| Sales Tax | $97 | $293 |
| Income Tax | $0 | $1,000 |
| Intergovernmental | $0 | $14,312 |
| Charges & Fees | $0 | $4,025 |
| Other | $53 | $3,184 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $628 | $0 |
| Fire Protection | $196 | $396 |
| Highways & Roads | $257 | $158 |
| Education | $0 | $23 |
| Public Welfare | $86 | $1,188 |
| Health | $762 | $293 |
| Hospitals | $0 | $993 |
| Parks & Recreation | $154 | $1,045 |
| Housing | $350 | $3,570 |
| Sewerage | $27 | $100 |
| Utilities | $41 | $3,826 |
| Other | $2,748 | $5,352 |
Compare More Cities
The side-by-side above pulls the the Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances data for both entity A and entity B. What follows is the interpretation — which specific axes carry the most weight for entity A versus entity B, and which differences are large enough to influence a real decision.
Practical use of the comparison: read the data above, then drill into the individual entity A and entity B detail pages for the underlying breakdown. A pairwise comparison answers the relative question; the per-entity pages answer the absolute question.
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.