Tulsa, OK vs Phoenix, AZ
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Phoenix, AZ outspends Tulsa, OK by a wide margin per resident — $15,793 versus $5,250, a 201% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Phoenix, AZ holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 67/100 (grade B) against 56/100 (grade C) for Tulsa, OK — a 11-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
Tulsa, OK reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Phoenix, AZ carries $1,156 per resident. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Tulsa, OK leads with health at $762 per resident, while Phoenix, AZ leads with parks and recreation at $652.
Summary
Phoenix spends 66.8% more per capita than Tulsa ($10,543/person difference). Phoenix, AZ has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 67/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $0 | $7 |
| Sales Tax | $97 | $338 |
| Income Tax | $0 | $1,260 |
| Intergovernmental | $0 | $50,709 |
| Charges & Fees | $0 | $2,998 |
| Other | $53 | $2,038 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $628 | $0 |
| Fire Protection | $196 | $170 |
| Highways & Roads | $257 | $86 |
| Education | $0 | $214 |
| Public Welfare | $86 | $507 |
| Health | $762 | $258 |
| Hospitals | $0 | $1,521 |
| Parks & Recreation | $154 | $652 |
| Housing | $350 | $3,879 |
| Sewerage | $27 | $388 |
| Utilities | $41 | $2,480 |
| Interest on Debt | $0 | $1,760 |
| Other | $2,748 | $3,878 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.