Tulsa, OK vs Lawton, OK
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Lawton, OK outspends Tulsa, OK by a wide margin per resident — $10,275 versus $5,250, a 96% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Lawton, OK holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 72/100 (grade B) against 56/100 (grade C) for Tulsa, OK — a 16-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
Tulsa, OK reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Lawton, OK carries $147 per resident. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Tulsa, OK leads with health at $762 per resident, while Lawton, OK leads with parks and recreation at $852.
Summary
Lawton spends 48.9% more per capita than Tulsa ($5,025/person difference). Lawton, OK has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 72/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Sales Tax | $97 | $144 |
| Income Tax | $0 | $1,106 |
| Intergovernmental | $0 | $9,501 |
| Charges & Fees | $0 | $2,888 |
| Other | $53 | $2,336 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $628 | $0 |
| Fire Protection | $196 | $126 |
| Highways & Roads | $257 | $0 |
| Education | $0 | $29 |
| Public Welfare | $86 | $452 |
| Health | $762 | $134 |
| Hospitals | $0 | $440 |
| Parks & Recreation | $154 | $852 |
| Housing | $350 | $2,674 |
| Sewerage | $27 | $0 |
| Utilities | $41 | $1,441 |
| Interest on Debt | $0 | $391 |
| Other | $2,748 | $3,736 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.