Tulsa, OK vs Fresno, CA
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Summary
Fresno spends 87.9% more per capita than Tulsa ($38,137/person difference). Tulsa, OK has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (C, 56/100).
Fiscal Health Score
C
56/100
Budget Balance4
Debt Burden100
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency100
Revenue Diversity0
Trend Direction50
C
50/100
Budget Balance0
Debt Burden100
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency0
Revenue Diversity100
Trend Direction50
Key Metrics
Metric
Tulsa
Fresno
Total Spending
$2.2B
$23.5B
Spending / Capita
$5,250
$43,387
Total Revenue
$0
$6.0B
Revenue / Capita
$0
$10,998
Total Debt
$0
$0
Debt / Capita
$0
$0
Population
411,938
541,528
Gov Employees / 10K
0.0
0.0
Avg Gov Salary
$0
$0
Per Capita Spending by Department
Police
Tulsa$628
Fresno$3,261
Fire Protection
Tulsa$196
Fresno$568
Highways & Roads
Tulsa$257
Fresno$0
Parks & Recreation
Tulsa$154
Fresno$76
Education
Tulsa$0
Fresno$3,942
Health
Tulsa$762
Fresno$599
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
TulsaFresno
| Property Tax | $0 | $337 |
| Sales Tax | $97 | $19 |
| Income Tax | $0 | $501 |
| Intergovernmental | $0 | -$4,470 |
| Charges & Fees | $0 | $11 |
| Other | $53 | $2,070 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
TulsaFresno
| Police | $628 | $3,261 |
| Fire Protection | $196 | $568 |
| Highways & Roads | $257 | $0 |
| Education | $0 | $3,942 |
| Public Welfare | $86 | $1,946 |
| Health | $762 | $599 |
| Parks & Recreation | $154 | $76 |
| Housing | $350 | $2,856 |
| Sewerage | $27 | $0 |
| Utilities | $41 | $15,340 |
| Interest on Debt | $0 | $255 |
| Other | $2,748 | $14,545 |
C
Tulsa, OK
Fiscal Health Score: 56/100
Average fiscal health
C
Fresno, CA
Fiscal Health Score: 50/100
Average fiscal health