Tulsa, OK vs Fresno, CA
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Fresno, CA outspends Tulsa, OK by a wide margin per resident — $43,387 versus $5,250, a 726% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Tulsa, OK edges Fresno, CA on the Fiscal Health Score by 6 points — 56/100 (grade C) to 50/100 (grade C). At a margin this narrow the grade is close enough that the factor-level detail matters more than the composite.
Neither city reports outstanding debt per resident in its current Census filing, which removes debt service as a point of difference between them. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Tulsa, OK leads with health at $762 per resident, while Fresno, CA leads with education at $3,942.
Summary
Fresno spends 87.9% more per capita than Tulsa ($38,137/person difference). Tulsa, OK has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (C, 56/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $0 | $337 |
| Sales Tax | $97 | $19 |
| Income Tax | $0 | $501 |
| Intergovernmental | $0 | -$4,470 |
| Charges & Fees | $0 | $11 |
| Other | $53 | $2,070 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $628 | $3,261 |
| Fire Protection | $196 | $568 |
| Highways & Roads | $257 | $0 |
| Education | $0 | $3,942 |
| Public Welfare | $86 | $1,946 |
| Health | $762 | $599 |
| Parks & Recreation | $154 | $76 |
| Housing | $350 | $2,856 |
| Sewerage | $27 | $0 |
| Utilities | $41 | $15,340 |
| Interest on Debt | $0 | $255 |
| Other | $2,748 | $14,545 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.